PMNV vs. ZMAY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PMNV (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November) and ZMAY (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMNV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZMAY.

Performance

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than ZMAY's 1.73% return.

PMNV

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMAY

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMNV PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November	2.67%	0.42%
ZMAY Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May	1.73%	0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PMNV and ZMAY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

PMNV vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMNV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZMAY

ZMAY Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMNV	ZMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.68	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	38.77	—

Drawdowns

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and ZMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMNV	ZMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-0.70%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.52%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.07%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMNV	ZMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65%	1.60%	+1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.65%	1.69%	+0.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.65%	1.69%	+0.96%

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMAY's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMNV vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMNV nor ZMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMNV and ZMAY in my portfolio?

PMNV and ZMAY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMNV or ZMAY?

On fees, PMNV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMNV or ZMAY?

PMNV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMNV or ZMAY?

PMNV and ZMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMNV and ZMAY?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.79% for ZMAY.