PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMNV vs. ZAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than ZAPR's 3.25% return.


PMNV

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZAPR

1D
0.03%
1M
0.52%
YTD
3.25%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMNV and ZAPR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMNV vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMNV

ZAPR
ZAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMNVZAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

2.96

-0.64

Drawdowns

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, roughly equal to the maximum ZAPR drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and ZAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMNVZAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-1.72%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.03%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-0.09%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

Volatility

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMNVZAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

1.46%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

2.51%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

2.51%

+0.13%

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMNV vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMNV nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMNV and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMNV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMNV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.

PMNV and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.79% for ZAPR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMNV and ZAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer