PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMNV vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMNV vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMNV achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.


PMNV

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.91%
6M
3.25%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.85%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.28%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMNV vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMNV and FBUF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMNV vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMNV

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMNV vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November (PMNV) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMNV vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMNVFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

1.47

+0.85

Drawdowns

PMNV vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMNV drawdown since its inception was -1.65%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMNV and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMNVFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-11.09%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.22%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-1.38%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

Volatility

PMNV vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMNVFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

7.49%

-4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

9.55%

-6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

9.55%

-6.91%

PMNV vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMNV vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

PMNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.63%0.64%0.54%
PMNV
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMNV and FBUF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMNV.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for PMNV.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMNV and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMNV and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer