PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMM vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMM vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMM achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than TFLO's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PMM has outperformed TFLO with an annualized return of 2.81%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.38% annualized return.


PMM

1D
0.68%
1M
3.79%
YTD
4.16%
6M
6.19%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
-1.39%
10Y*
2.81%

TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMM vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PMM
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust
4.16%10.50%2.84%1.89%-24.13%13.71%6.26%25.01%-4.49%10.56%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.81%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PMM and TFLO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMM vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMM
PMM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMM vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMMTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-48.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

14.01

-12.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

202.27

-200.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

827.47

-821.95

PMM vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 14.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMM and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMM vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMM drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMM and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMMTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.66%

-5.01%

-33.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-0.02%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-0.04%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.72%

-0.13%

-37.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

-0.16%

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.73%

0.00%

-9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-0.10%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

0.00%

+2.55%

Volatility

PMM vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.08%. This indicates that PMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMMTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

0.08%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

0.20%

+7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

0.29%

+10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

0.35%

+16.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

0.46%

+15.64%

Dividends

PMM vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

PMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than TFLO's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMM
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust
5.10%4.90%4.78%5.10%6.11%4.38%4.76%4.81%5.42%5.38%6.09%5.92%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.89%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMM and TFLO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMM has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to TFLO (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMM dropped -38.66% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.11 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMM and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer