PMM vs. RQI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMM (Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust) and RQI (Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PMM returned 2.68%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for RQI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PMM vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PMM has underperformed RQI with an annualized return of 2.68%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.

PMM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 3.10%
• 1Y: 11.84%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: -1.28%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

RQI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 6M: 17.42%
• 1Y: 15.71%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMM vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PMM Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust	1.18%	10.50%	2.84%	1.89%	-24.13%	13.71%	6.26%	25.01%	-4.49%	10.56%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	18.94%	2.07%	8.04%	15.74%	-31.07%	56.64%	-9.28%	54.62%	-11.11%	11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PMM and RQI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2002	0.19

The correlation between PMM and RQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PMM : $266.52M RQI : $1.76B
EPS PMM : $1.85 RQI : $1.09
PE Ratio PMM : 3.36 RQI : 12.08
PS Ratio PMM : 8.52 RQI : 4.89
PB Ratio PMM : 0.93 RQI : 1.08
Total Revenue (TTM) PMM : $31.28M RQI : $360.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) PMM : $67.33M RQI : $283.39M
EBITDA (TTM) PMM : $61.51M RQI : $130.74M

Return for Risk

PMM vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMM

PMM Risk / Return Rank: 72
PMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PMM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PMM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

RQI

RQI Risk / Return Rank: 67
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMM vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMM	RQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.06	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	1.51	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.19	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	1.34	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	3.99	+0.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMM vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMM and RQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMM	RQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	1.06	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.19	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.33	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.28	-0.05

Drawdowns

PMM vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMM drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMM and RQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMM	RQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.66%	-91.59%	+52.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.21%	-11.74%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	-22.43%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.72%	-41.06%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.72%	-59.12%	+21.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.32%	-2.02%	-10.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-17.93%	+6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.94%	-1.45%

Volatility

PMM vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (PMM) is 2.85%, while Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that PMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMM	RQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	4.02%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	11.59%	-3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.46%	14.90%	-4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	22.95%	-5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	26.94%	-10.84%

Dividends

PMM vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

PMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, less than RQI's 8.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PMM Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust	5.12%	4.90%	4.78%	5.10%	6.11%	4.38%	4.76%	4.81%	5.42%	5.38%	6.09%	5.92%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	8.70%	9.54%	7.84%	7.84%	10.41%	5.27%	7.74%	6.79%	9.27%	7.59%	7.86%	7.86%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMM and RQI in my portfolio?

PMM and RQI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMM or RQI?

RQI has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to PMM (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMM dropped -38.66% vs RQI's -91.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.