PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMM.TO (Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund) and PDIV.TO (Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMM.TO is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while PDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PMM.TO returned 3.51%/yr vs 9.28%/yr for PDIV.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMM.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than PDIV.TO's 7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PMM.TO has underperformed PDIV.TO with an annualized return of 3.51%, while PDIV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.

PMM.TO

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 6M: 3.53%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

PDIV.TO

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 7.12%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 9.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PMM.TO Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund	5.69%	6.07%	20.49%	5.85%	-3.80%	6.01%	-14.11%	1.88%	-2.86%	6.56%
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF	7.12%	15.82%	10.71%	4.64%	-4.40%	20.18%	-1.15%	23.57%	-15.24%	26.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PMM.TO and PDIV.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014	0.15

Over the past year, PMM.TO and PDIV.TO have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PMM.TO	PDIV.TO
Technology	32.5%	12.6%
Financial Services	12.4%	31.6%
Communication Services	11.5%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	7.8%
Industrials	10.0%	5.9%
Healthcare	8.5%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	3.9%
Energy	3.1%	18.2%
Basic Materials	2.3%	5.0%
Utilities	1.8%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMM.TO

PMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
PMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

PDIV.TO

PDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 82
PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) and Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMM.TO	PDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.78	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.86	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.56	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	3.62	+1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	15.98	-2.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the PDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMM.TO and PDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMM.TO	PDIV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	2.78	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.82	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.67	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.62	-0.32

Drawdowns

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, smaller than the maximum PDIV.TO drawdown of -30.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMM.TO and PDIV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMM.TO	PDIV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.50%	-30.64%	+7.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.50%	-5.22%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.87%	-8.61%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.18%	-14.96%	+3.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.50%	-30.64%	+7.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-1.27%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.97%	-4.35%	-3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.18%	+0.08%

Volatility

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund (PMM.TO) is 2.01%, while Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that PMM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMM.TO	PDIV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.01%	2.43%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.27%	5.36%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.45%	6.79%	+2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.76%	9.87%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.13%	13.89%	-3.76%

Dividends

PMM.TO vs. PDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

PMM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF	11.85%	12.24%	12.35%	11.84%	6.38%	5.59%	6.33%	5.85%	6.80%	25.71%	5.38%	8.10%
PMM.TO Purpose Multi-Strategy Market Neutral Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.92%	2.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMM.TO and PDIV.TO in my portfolio?

PMM.TO and PDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between PMM.TO and PDIV.TO?

PMM.TO is categorized as Long-Short, while PDIV.TO is Dividend.