PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L
PMLP.L (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) and ITEP.L (HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - PMLP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while ITEP.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PMLP.L returned 19.87%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for ITEP.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMLP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ITEP.L.
Performance
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMLP.L achieves a 26.71% return, which is significantly higher than ITEP.L's 24.17% return.
PMLP.L
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 26.71%
- 6M
- 26.31%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- —
ITEP.L
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.30%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 22.30%
- 1Y
- 47.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 26.71% | -1.40% | 35.81% | 7.61% | 35.33% | 34.88% | 8.45% |
ITEP.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 24.17% | 10.45% | 14.23% | 43.21% | -39.07% | 9.11% | 27.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMLP.L and ITEP.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between PMLP.L and ITEP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PMLP.L
ITEP.L
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
PMLP.L
ITEP.L
-
Basic Materials
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Communication Services
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Consumer Cyclical
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Consumer Defensive
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
-
Financial Services
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Healthcare
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Industrials
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Real Estate
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
-
Technology
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
Utilities
PMLP.L
-
ITEP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PMLP.L
ITEP.L
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) and HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMLP.L | ITEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.17 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 5.05 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMLP.L | ITEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.07 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.30 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.64 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMLP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum ITEP.L drawdown of -47.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMLP.L and ITEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMLP.L | ITEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -47.84% | +27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.82% | -21.64% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -29.42% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.50% | -47.84% | +27.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -1.89% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -18.56% | +12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 9.32% | -5.59% |
Volatility
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) at 6.99%. This indicates that PMLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMLP.L | ITEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 6.99% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 16.42% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 22.67% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 25.10% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 26.69% | -5.35% |
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMLP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEP.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMLP.L vs. ITEP.L - Dividend Comparison
PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, while ITEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEP.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF | 2.74% | 3.31% | 3.37% | 6.48% | 6.12% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMLP.L and ITEP.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMLP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMLP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ITEP.L.
PMLP.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while ITEP.L is Technology Equities. PMLP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while ITEP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PMLP.L and 0.59% for ITEP.L.
Find the right allocation for PMLP.L and ITEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer