ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L).
ITEP.L and RMAU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITEP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 5, 2018. RMAU.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Dec 2, 2020. Both ITEP.L and RMAU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEP.L HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating | -5.86% | 10.45% | 14.23% | 43.21% | -39.07% | 9.11% | 40.84% |
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | 12.56% | 52.84% | 28.16% | 7.63% | 11.68% | -3.23% | 8.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
ITEP.L is traded in GBp, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITEP.L achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly lower than RMAU.L's 12.56% return.
ITEP.L
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -5.86%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
RMAU.L
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 6M
- 25.55%
- 1Y
- 48.10%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 23.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITEP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITEP.L
RMAU.L
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITEP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.93 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.37 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.70 | -1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 11.20 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITEP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.93 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 1.42 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.90 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITEP.L and RMAU.L is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ITEP.L nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITEP.L drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than RMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEP.L and RMAU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITEP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -21.56% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -18.15% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.84% | -21.17% | -26.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.24% | -10.26% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.86% | -6.93% | -11.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 4.59% | +4.09% |
Volatility
ITEP.L vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) is 6.98%, while The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that ITEP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITEP.L | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | 12.79% | -5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.21% | 22.00% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 24.84% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 16.84% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 20.76% | +5.98% |