PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

ITEP.L is traded in GBp, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITEP.L achieves a -5.86% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -12.12% return.


ITEP.L

1D
3.25%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-5.86%
6M
-12.08%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*

FEPG.L

1D
1.91%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-12.12%
6M
-14.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITEP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITEP.L
ITEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ITEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FEPG.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAN-GINS Tech Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF - Accumulating (ITEP.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITEP.LFEPG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.18

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITEP.LFEPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.65

+1.12

Correlation

The correlation between ITEP.L and FEPG.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

ITEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


Drawdowns

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITEP.L drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITEP.L and FEPG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ITEP.LFEPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.84%

-23.44%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.24%

-21.25%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.86%

-7.91%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

Volatility

ITEP.L vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ITEP.LFEPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.63%

20.11%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.20%

20.11%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

20.11%

+6.63%