PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PML vs. PCRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PML vs. PCRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PML achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than PCRIX's 26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PML has outperformed PCRIX with an annualized return of -0.31%, while PCRIX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.66% annualized return.


PML

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.52%
6M
0.19%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
-7.70%
10Y*
-0.31%

PCRIX

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
26.86%
6M
23.71%
1Y
39.70%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
-9.52%
10Y*
-2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PML vs. PCRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PML
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II
1.52%-0.89%2.93%-3.06%-34.06%7.16%-5.17%25.60%7.25%14.48%
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
26.86%17.05%10.59%-68.64%8.94%33.35%0.79%12.29%-13.77%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PML and PCRIX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002

0.10

The correlation between PML and PCRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PML vs. PCRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PML
PML Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PML Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PML Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PML Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PML Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRIX
PCRIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PCRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PML vs. PCRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMLPCRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

5.66

-4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

17.68

-15.03

PML vs. PCRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PML Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the PCRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PML and PCRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMLPCRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.48

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

-0.27

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

-0.10

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.11

+0.30

Drawdowns

PML vs. PCRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PML drawdown since its inception was -64.34%, smaller than the maximum PCRIX drawdown of -88.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PML and PCRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMLPCRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.34%

-88.17%

+23.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-7.12%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.76%

-10.28%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.94%

-78.15%

+30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.94%

-78.15%

+30.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.34%

-79.68%

+44.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-51.80%

+39.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.27%

+0.49%

Volatility

PML vs. PCRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) is 3.63%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRIX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that PML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMLPCRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

5.27%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

14.12%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

16.32%

-5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

35.79%

-21.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

27.19%

-11.71%

PML vs. PCRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PML has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

PML vs. PCRIX - Dividend Comparison

PML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than PCRIX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCRIX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund
4.00%5.61%8.34%16.19%46.23%22.74%1.56%4.00%5.94%8.14%0.91%5.29%
PML
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II
6.35%6.29%5.86%5.71%7.83%4.85%4.95%4.91%5.86%5.92%6.38%6.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PML and PCRIX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRIX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to PML (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PML dropped -64.34% vs PCRIX's -88.17%.

PCRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PML and PCRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer