PML vs. NIM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PML (PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II) and NIM (Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PML returned -0.77%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for NIM. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PML charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for NIM.

Performance

PML vs. NIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) and Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PML achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NIM's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PML has underperformed NIM with an annualized return of -0.77%, while NIM has yielded a comparatively higher 1.51% annualized return.

PML

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.20%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 1Y: 7.16%
• 3Y*: -1.49%
• 5Y*: -8.41%
• 10Y*: -0.77%
• ALL TIME*: 3.25%

NIM

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: -1.25%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: -0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.51%
• ALL TIME*: 2.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund	$150.94K	$144.05K	$153.55K
PML PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II	$3.02M	$2.68M	$3.27M

PML vs. NIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PML PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II	0.40%	-0.89%	2.93%	-3.06%	-34.06%	7.16%	-5.17%	25.60%	7.25%	14.48%
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund	0.52%	10.88%	2.74%	0.75%	-12.95%	2.95%	5.44%	12.77%	-0.49%	5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PML and NIM is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2002	0.26

The correlation between PML and NIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PML vs. NIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PML

PML Risk / Return Rank: 20
PML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PML Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PML Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PML Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PML Martin Ratio Rank: 18

NIM

NIM Risk / Return Rank: 12
NIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
NIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
NIM Omega Ratio Rank: 13
NIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
NIM Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PML vs. NIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) and Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PML	NIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	0.53	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	0.78	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.10	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	0.72	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.83	1.58	+1.25

PML vs. NIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PML Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the NIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PML and NIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PML vs. NIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PML drawdown since its inception was -64.34%, which is greater than NIM's maximum drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PML and NIM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PML	NIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.34%	-23.09%	-41.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-6.67%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.65%	-6.83%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.77%	-19.96%	-27.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.94%	-19.96%	-27.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.05%	-5.99%	-30.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.04%	-5.92%	-6.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	3.02%	-0.17%

Volatility

PML vs. NIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II (PML) is 2.38%, while Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that PML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PML	NIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	2.58%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	7.31%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.59%	9.01%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	10.60%	+3.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	10.78%	+4.69%

PML vs. NIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PML has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than NIM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

PML vs. NIM - Dividend Comparison

PML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, more than NIM's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund	3.78%	3.61%	4.10%	3.49%	2.88%	2.69%	3.42%	3.03%	3.27%	3.15%	3.23%	3.27%
PML PIMCO Municipal Income Fund II	6.50%	6.29%	5.86%	5.71%	7.83%	4.85%	4.95%	4.91%	5.86%	5.92%	6.38%	6.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PML and NIM in my portfolio?

PML and NIM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PML or NIM?

NIM has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to PML (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PML dropped -64.34% vs NIM's -23.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.