PMJL vs. MMAX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PMJL (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMJL returned 6.56% vs 6.83% for MMAX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PMJL vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PMJL having a 3.35% return and MMAX slightly higher at 3.51%.

PMJL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 3.01%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 1Y: 6.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMAX

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 3.25%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 1Y: 6.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	3.35%	3.17%
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	3.51%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and MMAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.59

The correlation between PMJL and MMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMJL vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJL

PMJL Risk / Return Rank: 95
PMJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PMJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PMJL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PMJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PMJL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

MMAX

MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 98
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJL vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMJL	MMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	4.83	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.51	8.51	-3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	2.22	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	14.85	-10.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.54	70.64	-43.09

PMJL vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMJL Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is lower than the MMAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMJL and MMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum MMAX drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and MMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJL	MMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-1.93%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.49%	-0.46%	-1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.02%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-0.11%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	0.10%	+0.14%

Volatility

PMJL vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) at 0.42%. This indicates that PMJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMJL	MMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.42%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.64%	1.07%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01%	1.42%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.01%	2.43%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.01%	2.43%	-0.42%

PMJL vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMJL and MMAX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PMJL vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.

Position	TTM	2025
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.27%	1.31%
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJL and MMAX in my portfolio?

PMJL and MMAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMJL or MMAX?

PMJL has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to MMAX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMJL dropped -1.49% vs MMAX's -1.93%.

Which ETF is better, PMJL or MMAX?

On 1-year performance, MMAX leads with 6.83% vs 6.56% for PMJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMJL or MMAX?

Over the 1-year period, MMAX has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJL or MMAX?

PMJL and MMAX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJL or MMAX?

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.

What is the main difference between PMJL and MMAX?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.