PMJL vs. KAPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PMJL (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PMJL is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMJL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KAPR.

Performance

PMJL vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 12.34% return.

PMJL

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KAPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 23.29%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	3.02%	3.17%
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April	12.34%	8.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and KAPR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

PMJL vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMJL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KAPR

KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJL vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMJL	KAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.43	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.73	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	43.60	—

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and KAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJL	KAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-16.91%	+15.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-3.89%	+3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMJL	KAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02%	6.70%	-4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.02%	11.76%	-9.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.02%	11.65%	-9.63%

PMJL vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMJL vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMJL nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJL and KAPR in my portfolio?

PMJL and KAPR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMJL or KAPR?

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJL or KAPR?

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJL or KAPR?

PMJL and KAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMJL and KAPR?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.79% for KAPR.