PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMJL vs. DDTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMJL vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than DDTL's 4.57% return.


PMJL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDTL

1D
0.02%
1M
1.32%
YTD
4.57%
6M
5.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and DDTL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMJL vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMJL vs. DDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMJLDDTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

2.27

+0.96

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum DDTL drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and DDTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMJLDDTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-3.78%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-0.40%

+0.28%

Volatility

PMJL vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMJLDDTLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

5.46%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

5.46%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

5.46%

-3.40%

PMJL vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMJL vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMJL nor DDTL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMJL and DDTL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

PMJL and DDTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.79% for DDTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMJL and DDTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer