PMJL vs. CBTA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMJL (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July) and CBTA (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PMJL is actively managed, while CBTA is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMJL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTA.

Performance

PMJL vs. CBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than CBTA's -23.76% return.

PMJL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 3.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTA

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: -23.76%
• 6M: -26.89%
• 1Y: -28.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMJL vs. CBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	2.63%	3.39%
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-23.76%	-8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PMJL and CBTA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

PMJL vs. CBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBTA

CBTA Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMJL vs. CBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMJL	CBTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.23	-0.47	+3.70

Drawdowns

PMJL vs. CBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum CBTA drawdown of -36.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and CBTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMJL	CBTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-36.74%	+35.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-36.33%	+36.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-12.99%	+12.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	20.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMJL	CBTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06%	28.99%	-26.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.06%	27.68%	-25.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.06%	27.68%	-25.62%

PMJL vs. CBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMJL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CBTA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMJL vs. CBTA - Dividend Comparison

PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBTA Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	1.17%	0.89%
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMJL and CBTA in my portfolio?

PMJL and CBTA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMJL or CBTA?

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMJL or CBTA?

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMJL or CBTA?

CBTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.

What is the main difference between PMJL and CBTA?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMJL and 0.69% for CBTA.