PMJL vs. BUFP
PMJL (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. PMJL is actively managed, while BUFP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
PMJL vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMJL achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's 6.23% return.
PMJL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 17.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMJL vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July | 2.63% | 3.39% |
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 6.23% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMJL and BUFP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMJL vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank
PMJL
BUFP
PMJL vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMJL | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.23 | 1.40 | +1.84 |
Drawdowns
PMJL vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMJL drawdown since its inception was -1.49%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMJL and BUFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMJL | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -11.98% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.22% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -1.00% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility
PMJL vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMJL | BUFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 6.27% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 9.49% | -7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 9.49% | -7.43% |
PMJL vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PMJL and BUFP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
PMJL vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison
PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
PMJL PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMJL and BUFP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMJL and BUFP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
BUFP has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.
Find the right allocation for PMJL and BUFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer