PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMIO vs. PJFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMIO vs. PJFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF (PMIO) and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMIO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than PJFV's 16.30% return.


PMIO

1D
0.09%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJFV

1D
1.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
16.30%
6M
16.84%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMIO vs. PJFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PMIO
PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF
1.63%5.30%2.41%
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
16.30%18.65%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PMIO and PJFV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.11

PMIO vs. PJFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PMIO
PJFV

Financial Services

2.7%
16.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

9.1%

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

20.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

15.7%

Utilities

-

7.6%

Financial Services

PMIO
2.7%
PJFV
16.9%

Basic Materials

PMIO

-

PJFV
1.0%

Communication Services

PMIO

-

PJFV
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PMIO

-

PJFV
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

PMIO

-

PJFV
4.5%

Energy

PMIO

-

PJFV
9.1%

Healthcare

PMIO

-

PJFV
7.7%

Industrials

PMIO

-

PJFV
20.6%

Real Estate

PMIO

-

PJFV

-

Technology

PMIO

-

PJFV
15.7%

Utilities

PMIO

-

PJFV
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMIO vs. PJFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMIO
PMIO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PMIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PMIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMIO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFV
PJFV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PJFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMIO vs. PJFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF (PMIO) and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMIOPJFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.54

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

5.03

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

21.57

-11.81

PMIO vs. PJFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the PJFV Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMIO and PJFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMIOPJFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

2.99

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

1.56

+0.03

Drawdowns

PMIO vs. PJFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMIO drawdown since its inception was -3.39%, smaller than the maximum PJFV drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMIO and PJFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMIOPJFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-18.15%

+14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-7.31%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-2.11%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.70%

-1.03%

Volatility

PMIO vs. PJFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF (PMIO) is 0.73%, while PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that PMIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMIOPJFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

4.21%

-3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

10.05%

-8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

12.30%

-10.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

14.12%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.08%

14.12%

-11.04%

PMIO vs. PJFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMIO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFV's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMIO vs. PJFV - Dividend Comparison

PMIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than PJFV's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PJFV
PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
0.59%0.68%1.31%1.20%0.12%
PMIO
PGIM Municipal Income Opportunities ETF
3.92%4.00%2.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMIO and PJFV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJFV has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to PMIO (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMIO dropped -3.39% vs PJFV's -18.15%.

On 1-year performance, PJFV leads with 36.63% vs 6.54% for PMIO. On fees, PMIO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PMIO has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PJFV has performed better with a 36.63% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMIO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFV.

PMIO has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.59% for PJFV.

PMIO is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while PJFV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PMIO and 0.75% for PJFV.

PJFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMIO and PJFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer