PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMDE vs. APRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMDE vs. APRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.


PMDE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRB

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.41%
YTD
4.77%
6M
4.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMDE vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PMDE
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December
2.65%0.44%
APRB
Aptus April Buffer ETF
4.77%0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PMDE and APRB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMDE vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PMDE vs. APRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMDE vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum APRB drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and APRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMDEAPRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-4.59%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.23%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.72%

+0.47%

Volatility

PMDE vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMDEAPRBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

5.98%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.47%

5.98%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.47%

5.98%

-3.51%

PMDE vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMDE vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMDE nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMDE and APRB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMDE.

PMDE and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.25% for APRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMDE and APRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer