PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMDE vs. TAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMDE vs. TAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than TAPR's 2.09% return.


PMDE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.65%
6M
2.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAPR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.19%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.17%
1Y
6.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMDE vs. TAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMDE and TAPR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMDE vs. TAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMDE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TAPR
TAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMDE vs. TAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMDETAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.53

PMDE vs. TAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMDE vs. TAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum TAPR drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and TAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMDETAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-2.60%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.21%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.21%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

Volatility

PMDE vs. TAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMDETAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

2.26%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.47%

3.69%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.47%

3.69%

-1.22%

PMDE vs. TAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMDE vs. TAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMDE nor TAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PMDE and TAPR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TAPR.

PMDE and TAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PMDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TAPR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.79% for TAPR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMDE and TAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer