PMDE vs. TAPR
PMDE (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December) and TAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027) are both exchange-traded funds - PMDE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while TAPR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. PMDE is passively managed, while TAPR is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMDE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for TAPR.
Performance
PMDE vs. TAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMDE achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than TAPR's 2.09% return.
PMDE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAPR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 6.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMDE vs. TAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMDE PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December | 2.65% | 0.44% |
TAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 | 2.09% | 0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMDE and TAPR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMDE vs. TAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PMDE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TAPR
PMDE vs. TAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December (PMDE) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMDE | TAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.58 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMDE vs. TAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMDE drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum TAPR drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMDE and TAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMDE | TAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -2.60% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.21% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -0.21% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
PMDE vs. TAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMDE | TAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47% | 2.26% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 3.69% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 3.69% | -1.22% |
PMDE vs. TAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMDE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMDE vs. TAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMDE nor TAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PMDE and TAPR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMDE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMDE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TAPR.
PMDE and TAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PMDE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TAPR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMDE and 0.79% for TAPR.
Find the right allocation for PMDE and TAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer