PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBS vs. VETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBS vs. VETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than VETZ's 0.42% return.


PMBS

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VETZ

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.83%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBS vs. VETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.90%8.92%-2.75%
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
0.42%8.02%-2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and VETZ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.79

The correlation between PMBS and VETZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBS vs. VETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VETZ
VETZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBS vs. VETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMBSVETZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.52

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

8.75

-0.06

PMBS vs. VETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the VETZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and VETZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMBSVETZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.44

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. VETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum VETZ drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and VETZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBSVETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-5.16%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-2.73%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.59%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-1.30%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.79%

+0.08%

Volatility

PMBS vs. VETZ - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) at 1.36%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBSVETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

1.36%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

3.27%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

4.80%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

6.15%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

6.15%

-1.27%

PMBS vs. VETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VETZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBS vs. VETZ - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than VETZ's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.98%4.73%1.59%0.00%
VETZ
Academy Veteran Bond ETF
6.18%6.14%5.89%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMBS and VETZ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to VETZ (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs VETZ's -5.16%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 7.55% vs 6.86% for VETZ. On fees, VETZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VETZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VETZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

VETZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 4.98% for PMBS.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Academy. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.35% for VETZ.

PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBS and VETZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer