PMBS vs. VETZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and VETZ (Academy Veteran Bond ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMBS returned 3.73% vs 3.25% for VETZ. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VETZ.

Performance

PMBS vs. VETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than VETZ's -0.26% return.

PMBS

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: -0.59%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.15%

VETZ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -1.51%
• 6M: -0.70%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 1Y: 3.25%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	$4.24M	$3.71M	$5.44M
VETZ Academy Veteran Bond ETF	$1.59M	$827.02K	$450.36K

PMBS vs. VETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	0.07%	8.92%	-2.80%
VETZ Academy Veteran Bond ETF	-0.26%	8.02%	-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and VETZ is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024	0.80

The correlation between PMBS and VETZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PMBS vs. VETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMBS

PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 34
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 34

VETZ

VETZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
VETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
VETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
VETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
VETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
VETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMBS vs. VETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMBS	VETZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.71	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.04	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.12	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	1.20	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	3.45	+0.01

PMBS vs. VETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the VETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and VETZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. VETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum VETZ drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and VETZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMBS	VETZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-5.16%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-2.73%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-2.25%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-1.30%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	0.95%	+0.13%

Volatility

PMBS vs. VETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) is 1.30%, while Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that PMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMBS	VETZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	1.37%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.39%	3.36%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.14%	4.61%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	6.08%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.85%	6.08%	-1.23%

PMBS vs. VETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VETZ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMBS vs. VETZ - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than VETZ's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund	4.98%	4.73%	1.59%	0.00%
VETZ Academy Veteran Bond ETF	6.10%	6.14%	5.89%	1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMBS and VETZ in my portfolio?

PMBS and VETZ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMBS or VETZ?

VETZ has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to PMBS (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs VETZ's -5.16%.

Which ETF is better, PMBS or VETZ?

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 3.73% vs 3.25% for VETZ. On fees, VETZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMBS or VETZ?

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 3.73% return vs 3.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMBS or VETZ?

VETZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMBS or VETZ?

VETZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 4.98% for PMBS.

What is the main difference between PMBS and VETZ?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Academy. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.35% for VETZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.