PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBS vs. VABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBS vs. VABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than VABS's 1.82% return.


PMBS

1D
0.54%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.48%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VABS

1D
0.12%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.89%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBS vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and VABS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024

0.58

The correlation between PMBS and VABS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBS vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBS vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PMBSVABSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

4.05

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

10.46

-3.33

PMBS vs. VABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the VABS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and VABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum VABS drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and VABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBSVABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-7.12%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-0.98%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.02%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.15%

-1.40%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.38%

+0.55%

Volatility

PMBS vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) at 0.38%. This indicates that PMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBSVABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

0.38%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

1.07%

+2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

2.01%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

2.30%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

2.24%

+2.65%

PMBS vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBS vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than VABS's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.95%4.73%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.06%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMBS and VABS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to VABS (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs VABS's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 6.63% vs 3.97% for VABS. On fees, VABS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VABS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

VABS has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 4.95% for PMBS.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.39% for VABS.

VABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBS and VABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer