PMBS vs. MBSX
PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and MBSX (Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMBS returned 7.55% vs 13.81% for MBSX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MBSX.
Performance
PMBS vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than MBSX's 6.22% return.
PMBS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSX
- 1D
- 9.68%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 13.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMBS vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.90% | 5.92% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 6.22% | 8.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBS and MBSX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBS vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank
PMBS
MBSX
PMBS vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMBS | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 0.50 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 2.08 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMBS | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.26 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.25 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
PMBS vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and MBSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBS | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -27.57% | +23.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -27.57% | +24.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -20.56% | +19.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -6.02% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 6.64% | -5.77% |
Volatility
PMBS vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) is 1.52%, while Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a volatility of 41.45%. This indicates that PMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBS | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | 41.45% | -39.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 50.89% | -47.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 53.40% | -49.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 54.70% | -49.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 54.70% | -49.82% |
PMBS vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBS vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison
PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MBSX's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 3.36% | 2.77% | 0.00% |
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.98% | 4.73% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBS and MBSX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBSX has higher volatility (41.45%) compared to PMBS (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs MBSX's -27.57%.
On 1-year performance, MBSX leads with 13.81% vs 7.55% for PMBS. On fees, MBSX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MBSX has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MBSX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.
PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 3.36% for MBSX.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.40% for MBSX.
PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMBS and MBSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer