PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PMBS vs. MBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PMBS vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than MBSX's 6.22% return.


PMBS

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBSX

1D
9.68%
1M
3.16%
YTD
6.22%
6M
6.79%
1Y
13.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBS vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PMBS and MBSX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PMBS vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MBSX
MBSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBS vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PMBSMBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.15

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.50

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

2.08

+6.61

PMBS vs. MBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the MBSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBS and MBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PMBSMBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.26

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.25

+0.58

Drawdowns

PMBS vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and MBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PMBSMBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-27.57%

+23.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-27.57%

+24.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-20.56%

+19.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-6.02%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

6.64%

-5.77%

Volatility

PMBS vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) is 1.52%, while Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a volatility of 41.45%. This indicates that PMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PMBSMBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

41.45%

-39.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

50.89%

-47.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

53.40%

-49.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

54.70%

-49.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

54.70%

-49.82%

PMBS vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PMBS vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison

PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MBSX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MBSX
Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF
3.36%2.77%0.00%
PMBS
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.98%4.73%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PMBS and MBSX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBSX has higher volatility (41.45%) compared to PMBS (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs MBSX's -27.57%.

On 1-year performance, MBSX leads with 13.81% vs 7.55% for PMBS. On fees, MBSX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBSX has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBSX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 3.36% for MBSX.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.40% for MBSX.

PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PMBS and MBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer