PMBS vs. FFUT
PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by PIMCO, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
PMBS vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.74% return.
PMBS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 7.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMBS vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.90% | 6.15% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.74% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBS and FFUT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBS vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
PMBS
FFUT
PMBS vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PMBS | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMBS | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 2.01 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
PMBS vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBS | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -2.84% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -0.90% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -0.88% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
PMBS vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBS | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 11.17% | -6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 11.17% | -6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 11.17% | -6.29% |
PMBS vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBS vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than FFUT's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.85% | 2.09% | 0.00% |
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.98% | 4.73% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBS and FFUT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMBS is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMBS is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.
PMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 0.80% for FFUT.
Find the right allocation for PMBS and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer