PMBS vs. FBDC
PMBS (PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by PIMCO, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMBS returned 6.17% vs -12.28% for FBDC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PMBS charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
PMBS vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMBS achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -6.34% return.
PMBS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBDC
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- -6.34%
- 1Y
- -12.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMBS vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 0.85% | 4.78% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -6.34% | -2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMBS and FBDC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMBS vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
PMBS
FBDC
PMBS vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMBS | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.90 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.60 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | -1.01 | +7.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMBS vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMBS drawdown since its inception was -4.35%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBS and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMBS | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -20.60% | +16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -20.60% | +17.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -14.34% | +12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -10.72% | +9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 12.18% | -11.21% |
Volatility
PMBS vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) is 1.40%, while FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) has a volatility of 4.23%. This indicates that PMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMBS | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 4.23% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | 14.48% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 17.97% | -13.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 17.83% | -12.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 17.83% | -12.96% |
PMBS vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMBS has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMBS vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
PMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than FBDC's 12.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 12.27% | 5.41% | 0.00% |
PMBS PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.96% | 4.73% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMBS and FBDC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBDC has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to PMBS (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBS dropped -4.35% vs FBDC's -20.60%.
On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 6.17% vs -12.28% for FBDC. On fees, PMBS is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, PMBS has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 6.17% return vs -12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMBS is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 12.27%, compared with 4.96% for PMBS.
PMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for PMBS and 1.35% for FBDC.
PMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMBS and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer