PMBMX vs. CVISX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PMBMX (Principal MidCap Fund) and CVISX (Causeway International Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - PMBMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal, while CVISX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Causeway. Over the past 10 years, PMBMX returned 11.23%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for CVISX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PMBMX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for CVISX.

Performance

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMBMX achieves a -8.91% return, which is significantly lower than CVISX's 15.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PMBMX having a 11.23% annualized return and CVISX not far ahead at 11.50%.

PMBMX

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: -8.91%
• 6M: -9.65%
• 1Y: -10.31%
• 3Y*: 9.28%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

CVISX

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 15.17%
• 6M: 18.35%
• 1Y: 31.38%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 13.41%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund	-8.91%	1.16%	23.38%	25.36%	-23.52%	24.63%	17.69%	49.09%	-7.28%	24.73%
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund	15.17%	32.93%	9.71%	26.74%	-11.51%	21.30%	2.48%	18.55%	-21.34%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PMBMX and CVISX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.59

The correlation between PMBMX and CVISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PMBMX vs. CVISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMBMX

PMBMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PMBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PMBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PMBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PMBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PMBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CVISX

CVISX Risk / Return Rank: 59
CVISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CVISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CVISX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CVISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CVISX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) and Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMBMX	CVISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	2.33	-3.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	3.13	-4.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.41	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	3.04	-3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	10.69	-11.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PMBMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the CVISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PMBMX and CVISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMBMX	CVISX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	2.33	-3.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	0.84	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.69	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.65	-0.09

Drawdowns

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMBMX drawdown since its inception was -50.69%, roughly equal to the maximum CVISX drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMBMX and CVISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMBMX	CVISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.69%	-48.50%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.53%	-10.77%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.53%	-15.17%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.48%	-25.20%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.60%	-48.50%	+7.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.01%	-1.28%	-13.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.73%	-8.89%	+2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.88%	3.05%	+5.83%

Volatility

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Volatility Comparison

Principal MidCap Fund (PMBMX) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) at 3.59%. This indicates that PMBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PMBMX	CVISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	3.59%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	11.47%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	14.04%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.66%	16.06%	+2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	16.82%	+2.36%

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMBMX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CVISX's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMBMX vs. CVISX - Dividend Comparison

PMBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, less than CVISX's 14.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVISX Causeway International Small Cap Fund	14.38%	16.56%	10.60%	6.14%	2.75%	3.48%	3.42%	3.57%	2.91%	8.23%	2.78%	2.00%
PMBMX Principal MidCap Fund	7.04%	6.41%	6.86%	2.68%	3.43%	8.51%	1.15%	9.00%	12.79%	3.39%	2.16%	6.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMBMX and CVISX in my portfolio?

PMBMX and CVISX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PMBMX or CVISX?

PMBMX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to CVISX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMBMX dropped -50.69% vs CVISX's -48.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.