PMAU vs. UXJL
PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAU charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
PMAU vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAU achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
PMAU
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAU vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 2.95% | 2.98% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 10.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAU and UXJL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAU vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PMAU | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.90 | 1.87 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
PMAU vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAU drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAU and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAU | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -10.29% | +8.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.76% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -1.51% | +1.34% |
Volatility
PMAU vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAU | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 13.90% | -11.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 13.90% | -11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 13.90% | -11.39% |
PMAU vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAU vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither PMAU nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PMAU and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PMAU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMAU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
PMAU and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMAU and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for PMAU and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer