PMAU vs. PBJN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) and PBJN (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PMAU returned 7.00% vs 7.79% for PBJN. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

PMAU vs. PBJN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAU achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly higher than PBJN's 3.13% return.

PMAU

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 3.48%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 1Y: 7.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PBJN

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.17%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBJN PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June	$190.56K	$168.44K	$656.43K
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August	$48.78K	$23.35K	$8.53K

PMAU vs. PBJN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August	3.90%	2.94%
PBJN PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June	3.13%	3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAU and PBJN is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

PMAU vs. PBJN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PMAU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PBJN

PBJN Risk / Return Rank: 77
PBJN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PBJN Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PBJN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PBJN Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PBJN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PMAU vs. PBJN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PMAU	PBJN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.02	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.32	—

Drawdowns

PMAU vs. PBJN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAU drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum PBJN drawdown of -8.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAU and PBJN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAU	PBJN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-8.70%	+6.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	-2.40%	+0.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.52%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.15%	-0.61%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMAU	PBJN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35%	4.55%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.35%	7.29%	-4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.35%	7.29%	-4.94%

PMAU vs. PBJN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PMAU and PBJN have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

PMAU vs. PBJN - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAU nor PBJN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMAU and PBJN in my portfolio?

PMAU and PBJN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMAU or PBJN?

On 1-year performance, PBJN leads with 7.79% vs 7.00% for PMAU. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PMAU or PBJN?

Over the 1-year period, PBJN has performed better with a 7.79% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMAU or PBJN?

PMAU and PBJN have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMAU or PBJN?

PMAU and PBJN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.