PMAU vs. JANZ
PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) and JANZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAU charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JANZ.
Performance
PMAU vs. JANZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAU achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than JANZ's 6.09% return.
PMAU
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANZ
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 6.09%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PMAU vs. JANZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 3.05% | 2.94% |
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 6.09% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAU and JANZ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAU vs. JANZ — Risk / Return Rank
PMAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JANZ
PMAU vs. JANZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAU | JANZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAU vs. JANZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAU drawdown since its inception was -1.79%, smaller than the maximum JANZ drawdown of -18.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAU and JANZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAU | JANZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.79% | -18.11% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.52% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -3.47% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility
PMAU vs. JANZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAU | JANZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48% | 10.00% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 13.23% | -10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 13.01% | -10.53% |
PMAU vs. JANZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JANZ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAU vs. JANZ - Dividend Comparison
PMAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JANZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF | 1.34% | 1.42% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 0.21% | 4.52% |
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PMAU and JANZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PMAU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMAU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JANZ.
JANZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for PMAU.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMAU and 0.79% for JANZ.
Find the right allocation for PMAU and JANZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer