PMAQX vs. SECUX
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and SECUX (Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 5.10%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for SECUX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for SECUX.
Performance
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 12.62% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 1Y
- -8.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
SECUX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -4.40% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 12.62% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and SECUX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PMAQX and SECUX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
SECUX
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAQX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.14 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.46 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 4.80 | -5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and SECUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -71.68% | +31.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -9.17% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -25.43% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | -37.80% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -4.07% | -6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -18.36% | +11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 2.78% | +6.72% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) is 3.93%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PMAQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 5.87% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 13.70% | -2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 16.93% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 21.59% | -2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 21.19% | -1.76% |
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.07% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and SECUX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SECUX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to PMAQX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs SECUX's -71.68%.
SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and SECUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer