PMAQX vs. FLPKX
PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) and FLPKX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K) are both mutual funds - PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal Funds, while FLPKX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, PMAQX returned 4.62%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for FLPKX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLPKX.
Performance
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PMAQX achieves a -7.06% return, which is significantly lower than FLPKX's 10.08% return.
PMAQX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -9.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FLPKX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -7.06% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
FLPKX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K | 10.08% | 14.75% | 7.33% | 14.50% | -5.63% | 24.57% | 9.42% | 25.89% | -10.73% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PMAQX and FLPKX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PMAQX and FLPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PMAQX vs. FLPKX — Risk / Return Rank
PMAQX
FLPKX
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PMAQX | FLPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.29 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.38 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 8.06 | -9.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PMAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, smaller than the maximum FLPKX drawdown of -51.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAQX and FLPKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PMAQX | FLPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -51.34% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -8.84% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.25% | -17.64% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.10% | -18.71% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.11% | -1.69% | -11.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -6.47% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.17% | 2.60% | +6.57% |
Volatility
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Volatility Comparison
Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K (FLPKX) at 3.49%. This indicates that PMAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PMAQX | FLPKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 3.49% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 9.18% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 12.81% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 17.23% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 17.32% | +2.14% |
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PMAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPKX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
PMAQX vs. FLPKX - Dividend Comparison
PMAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than FLPKX's 12.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPKX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund Class K | 12.11% | 13.34% | 16.33% | 18.41% | 9.55% | 12.20% | 11.24% | 8.23% | 13.58% | 7.46% | 4.95% | 4.08% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 6.24% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PMAQX and FLPKX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMAQX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FLPKX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PMAQX dropped -40.56% vs FLPKX's -51.34%.
FLPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PMAQX and FLPKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer