PMAP vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PMAP (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PMAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

PMAP vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PMAP achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.35% return.

PMAP

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 7.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PMAP vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PMAP PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April	3.28%	1.33%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.35%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PMAP and JULB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

PMAP vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PMAP

PMAP Risk / Return Rank: 99
PMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PMAP vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - April (PMAP) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PMAP	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	13.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	21.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	133.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PMAP	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.23	2.17	+1.06

Drawdowns

PMAP vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PMAP drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum JULB drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PMAP and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PMAP	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-5.24%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.07%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-0.87%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PMAP	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15%	6.81%	-5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.33%	6.81%	-4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.33%	6.81%	-4.48%

PMAP vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PMAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PMAP vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither PMAP nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PMAP and JULB in my portfolio?

PMAP and JULB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PMAP or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PMAP or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PMAP or JULB?

PMAP and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PMAP and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PMAP and 0.25% for JULB.