PM vs. INTC
PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) and INTC (Intel Corporation) are both stocks. PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive), while INTC operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PM returned 11.71%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for INTC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PM vs. INTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PM achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 237.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PM has underperformed INTC with an annualized return of 11.71%, while INTC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.03% annualized return.
PM
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
INTC
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 237.59%
- 6M
- 229.46%
- 1Y
- 518.52%
- 3Y*
- 55.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.03%
PM vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 15.93% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
INTC Intel Corporation | 237.59% | 84.04% | -59.57% | 94.56% | -46.64% | 6.05% | -14.69% | 30.71% | 4.23% | 30.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PM and INTC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.24 |
The correlation between PM and INTC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PM:
$288.03B
INTC:
$633.19B
PM:
$7.12
INTC:
-$0.67
PM:
6.93
INTC:
10.91
PM:
$41.49B
INTC:
$53.76B
PM:
$27.93B
INTC:
$19.05B
PM:
$17.74B
INTC:
$8.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PM vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank
PM
INTC
PM vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PM | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.67 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 20.85 | -20.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 48.84 | -48.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PM vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PM drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum INTC drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PM and INTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PM | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -82.25% | +39.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.64% | -24.17% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -63.80% | +43.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.78% | -65.53% | +42.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.87% | -70.80% | +27.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -3.76% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.02% | -36.66% | +26.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 10.30% | +0.51% |
Volatility
PM vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) is 7.76%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 24.56%. This indicates that PM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PM | INTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.76% | 24.56% | -16.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 58.47% | -37.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.73% | 73.69% | -45.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 52.29% | -29.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 44.20% | -19.74% |
Dividends
PM vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison
PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.87% | 1.47% | 5.52% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.79% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.13% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
PM vs. INTC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Philip Morris International Inc. and Intel Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PM vs. INTC - Profitability Comparison
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
INTC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
INTC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
INTC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PM and INTC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTC has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to PM (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PM dropped -42.87% vs INTC's -82.25%.
INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PM and INTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer