PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
PLZ-UN.TO (Plaza Retail REIT) is a stock, while QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Over the past year, PLZ-UN.TO returned 40.26% vs 38.21% for QDAY.NEO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLZ-UN.TO achieves a 24.88% return, which is significantly higher than QDAY.NEO's 23.56% return.
PLZ-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- YTD
- 24.88%
- 1Y
- 40.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
QDAY.NEO
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 19.69%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 38.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLZ-UN.TO Plaza Retail REIT | 24.88% | 12.89% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 23.56% | 14.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLZ-UN.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
PLZ-UN.TO
QDAY.NEO
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLZ-UN.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.27 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.40 | 1.99 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.00 | 5.45 | +9.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLZ-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLZ-UN.TO and QDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLZ-UN.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.56% | -19.44% | -28.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -19.44% | +11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -6.97% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -5.04% | -6.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 7.07% | -4.38% |
Volatility
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO) at 9.79%. This indicates that PLZ-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDAY.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLZ-UN.TO | QDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.05% | 9.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 20.47% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 25.41% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 25.28% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 25.28% | -4.93% |
Dividends
PLZ-UN.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
PLZ-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than QDAY.NEO's 17.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLZ-UN.TO Plaza Retail REIT | 5.39% | 6.53% | 7.91% | 7.60% | 6.17% | 5.92% | 7.76% | 6.13% | 7.21% | 6.34% | 5.20% | 5.32% |
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF | 17.60% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLZ-UN.TO and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PLZ-UN.TO and QDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer