PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLZ-UN.TO
Plaza Retail REIT
-0.80%30.09%3.87%-11.82%1.15%39.55%-14.33%25.75%-2.54%-9.66%
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-30.62%-13.47%-5.92%-12.14%-38.62%20.95%-24.39%21.30%9.29%21.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$480.45M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$1.28B

EPS

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$0.50

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$9.50

PS Ratio

PLZ-UN.TO:

3.66

AP-UN.TO:

2.17

PB Ratio

PLZ-UN.TO:

0.85

AP-UN.TO:

0.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$128.49M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$592.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$80.91M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$313.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$88.31M

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$1.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLZ-UN.TO achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly higher than AP-UN.TO's -30.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PLZ-UN.TO has outperformed AP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 5.79%, while AP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -7.12% annualized return.


PLZ-UN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.65%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
3.78%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
5.79%

AP-UN.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
-30.62%
6M
-54.09%
1Y
-38.83%
3Y*
-19.95%
5Y*
-19.48%
10Y*
-7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLZ-UN.TO
PLZ-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

AP-UN.TO
AP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLZ-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

-0.89

+2.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

-0.97

+2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.81

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

-0.67

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.51

-1.34

+8.84

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLZ-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLZ-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLZ-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

-0.89

+2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.65

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

-0.26

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.24

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PLZ-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLZ-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than AP-UN.TO's 15.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLZ-UN.TO
Plaza Retail REIT
6.65%6.53%7.91%7.61%6.25%5.93%7.76%6.13%7.21%6.34%5.20%5.64%
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
15.03%12.79%10.50%11.30%6.84%3.88%4.38%3.07%3.53%3.65%4.18%4.65%

Drawdowns

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLZ-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.55%, smaller than the maximum AP-UN.TO drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLZ-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLZ-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.55%

-76.72%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-58.74%

+50.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.22%

-73.59%

+47.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.12%

-76.72%

+34.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-75.88%

+68.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-16.94%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

29.23%

-26.59%

Volatility

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) at 5.97%. This indicates that PLZ-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLZ-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

5.97%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

43.47%

-31.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.63%

43.81%

-28.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

30.15%

-12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

27.33%

-7.24%

Financials

PLZ-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plaza Retail REIT and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
32.76M
148.77M
(PLZ-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items