PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO).
Performance
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLZ-UN.TO Plaza Retail REIT | 0.93% | 30.09% | 3.87% | -11.82% | 1.15% | 39.55% | -14.33% | 25.75% | -2.54% | -9.66% |
CAR-UN.TO Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | -1.11% | -10.17% | -6.48% | 19.26% | -26.56% | 22.96% | -2.97% | 22.93% | 22.52% | 23.53% |
Fundamentals
PLZ-UN.TO:
CA$486.16M
CAR-UN.TO:
CA$5.68B
PLZ-UN.TO:
CA$0.50
CAR-UN.TO:
CA$1.24
PLZ-UN.TO:
8.60
CAR-UN.TO:
29.10
PLZ-UN.TO:
0.91
CAR-UN.TO:
0.06
PLZ-UN.TO:
3.70
CAR-UN.TO:
5.72
PLZ-UN.TO:
0.86
CAR-UN.TO:
0.65
PLZ-UN.TO:
CA$128.49M
CAR-UN.TO:
CA$1.00B
PLZ-UN.TO:
CA$80.91M
CAR-UN.TO:
CA$593.74M
PLZ-UN.TO:
CA$88.31M
CAR-UN.TO:
CA$480.34M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLZ-UN.TO achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than CAR-UN.TO's -1.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLZ-UN.TO having a 5.97% annualized return and CAR-UN.TO not far ahead at 6.10%.
PLZ-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.97%
CAR-UN.TO
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -9.08%
- 1Y
- -12.23%
- 3Y*
- -3.99%
- 5Y*
- -3.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PLZ-UN.TO
CAR-UN.TO
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLZ-UN.TO | CAR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | -0.63 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | -0.78 | +2.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.91 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | -0.61 | +3.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | -1.06 | +8.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLZ-UN.TO | CAR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.63 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | -0.19 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.29 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.35 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLZ-UN.TO and CAR-UN.TO is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
PLZ-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than CAR-UN.TO's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLZ-UN.TO Plaza Retail REIT | 6.57% | 6.53% | 7.91% | 7.61% | 6.25% | 5.93% | 7.76% | 6.13% | 7.21% | 6.34% | 5.20% | 5.64% |
CAR-UN.TO Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 4.30% | 4.19% | 7.00% | 4.12% | 3.40% | 2.35% | 2.76% | 2.59% | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.95% | 4.50% |
Drawdowns
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLZ-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.55%, smaller than the maximum CAR-UN.TO drawdown of -65.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLZ-UN.TO and CAR-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLZ-UN.TO | CAR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.55% | -65.08% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -21.37% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.22% | -34.95% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.12% | -38.20% | -3.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -29.84% | +24.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -9.17% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 12.34% | -9.65% |
Volatility
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) at 4.49%. This indicates that PLZ-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAR-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLZ-UN.TO | CAR-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 4.49% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 12.21% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 19.57% | -3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 21.04% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 21.03% | -0.94% |
Financials
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plaza Retail REIT and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLZ-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
PLZ-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported a gross profit of 21.09M and revenue of 32.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.4%.
CAR-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 144.73M and revenue of 243.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.5%.
PLZ-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported an operating income of 17.66M and revenue of 32.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.9%.
CAR-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 151.08M and revenue of 243.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.1%.
PLZ-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported a net income of 24.62M and revenue of 32.76M, resulting in a net margin of 75.1%.
CAR-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 88.41M and revenue of 243.30M, resulting in a net margin of 36.3%.