PLYY vs. IPDP
PLYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. PLYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
PLYY vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLYY
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -29.48%
- YTD
- -27.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLYY vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | -13.98% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLYY vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLYY vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLYY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.36% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | — | — |
Volatility
PLYY vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLYY | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.28% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | — | — |
PLYY vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLYY vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
PLYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.40%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | 131.40% | 32.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PLYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
PLYY has the higher dividend yield at 131.40%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLYY and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for PLYY and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer