PLYY vs. BAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PLYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). PLYY is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

PLYY vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLYY achieves a -23.83% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's 2.94% return.

PLYY

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -8.23%
• YTD: -23.83%
• 6M: -25.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAR

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 32.26%
• 3Y*: 31.38%
• 5Y*: 18.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLYY vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF	-23.83%	-3.53%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	2.94%	14.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PLYY and BAR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

PLYY vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 32
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLYY vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLYY	BAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.21	0.90	-2.11

Drawdowns

PLYY vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLYY drawdown since its inception was -33.93%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLYY and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLYY	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.93%	-21.53%	-12.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.86%	-17.72%	-16.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.04%	-6.45%	-11.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PLYY	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.86%	26.43%	+3.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.86%	17.90%	+11.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.86%	16.38%	+13.48%

PLYY vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLYY vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

PLYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 110.96%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF	110.96%	32.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLYY and BAR in my portfolio?

PLYY and BAR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PLYY or BAR?

On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLYY or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PLYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLYY or BAR?

PLYY has the higher dividend yield at 110.96%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.

What is the main difference between PLYY and BAR?

PLYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLYY and 0.17% for BAR.