PLYY vs. AMDY
PLYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
PLYY vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLYY achieves a -28.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 90.29% return.
PLYY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- 6M
- 77.61%
- YTD
- 90.29%
- 1Y
- 136.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22.48M | $23.10M | $23.59M | |
| $52.81K | $54.69K | $65.16K |
PLYY vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | -28.21% | -3.83% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 90.29% | 28.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLYY and AMDY is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLYY vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
PLYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDY
PLYY vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF (PLYY) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLYY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLYY vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLYY drawdown since its inception was -39.49%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLYY and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLYY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.49% | -53.92% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.66% | -14.53% | -23.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.62% | -17.40% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility
PLYY vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLYY | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 48.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.68% | 60.11% | -32.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 48.03% | -20.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 48.03% | -20.35% |
PLYY vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLYY vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
PLYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 139.63%, more than AMDY's 75.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 75.62% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
PLYY GraniteShares YieldBoost PLTR ETF | 139.63% | 32.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLYY and AMDY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.
PLYY has the higher dividend yield at 139.63%, compared with 75.62% for AMDY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLYY and 1.23% for AMDY.
Find the right allocation for PLYY and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer