PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLW vs. TFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLW vs. TFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than TFLO's 1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PLW has underperformed TFLO with an annualized return of -0.10%, while TFLO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.


PLW

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
0.89%
5Y*
-2.77%
10Y*
-0.10%

TFLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLW vs. TFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLW
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF
-0.55%5.84%-2.95%3.31%-19.98%-3.76%12.55%10.00%-0.28%4.96%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.59%4.22%5.34%5.12%1.99%-0.02%0.43%2.04%1.76%1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PLW and TFLO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLW vs. TFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLW
PLW Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLW Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLO
TFLO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLW vs. TFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLWTFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-13.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-49.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

13.94

-12.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

201.22

-200.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

823.26

-821.03

PLW vs. TFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the TFLO Sharpe Ratio of 14.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLW and TFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLWTFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

14.09

-13.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

10.30

-10.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

5.21

-5.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.99

-0.67

Drawdowns

PLW vs. TFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than TFLO's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and TFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLWTFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-5.01%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

-0.02%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-0.04%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-0.13%

-28.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

-0.16%

-32.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.38%

0.00%

-22.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-0.10%

-9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.00%

+1.94%

Volatility

PLW vs. TFLO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) has a higher volatility of 2.04% compared to iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF (TFLO) at 0.07%. This indicates that PLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLWTFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

0.07%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

0.20%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.58%

0.28%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

0.35%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

0.46%

+8.64%

PLW vs. TFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLW vs. TFLO - Dividend Comparison

PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than TFLO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLW
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF
3.83%3.75%3.56%2.87%1.97%1.15%1.00%1.96%2.14%2.02%2.00%2.14%
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
3.90%4.16%5.21%4.88%1.68%0.00%0.36%2.08%1.65%0.86%0.31%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLW and TFLO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLW has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to TFLO (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLW dropped -32.70% vs TFLO's -5.01%.

On 10-year performance, TFLO leads with 2.37% vs -0.10% for PLW. On fees, TFLO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TFLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TFLO has performed better with a 2.37% return vs -0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFLO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PLW.

TFLO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.83% for PLW.

PLW tracks Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index, while TFLO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PLW and 0.15% for TFLO.

TFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.09 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLW and TFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer