PLW vs. SMBS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS).
PLW and SMBS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Ryan/NASDAQ 1-30 Year Treasury Laddered Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. SMBS is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2024. Both PLW and SMBS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PLW vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLW vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | -0.06% | 5.84% | -1.45% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.36% | 8.15% | -0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than SMBS's 0.36% return.
PLW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 0.38%
- 5Y*
- -2.40%
- 10Y*
- 0.10%
SMBS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 5.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLW vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PLW vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank
PLW
SMBS
PLW vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLW | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.25 | 1.12 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.39 | 1.61 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.94 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | 5.61 | -4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLW | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 1.12 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.27 | -0.95 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLW and SMBS is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLW vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison
PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than SMBS's 4.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLW Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 2.87% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.00% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 2.00% | 2.14% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 4.80% | 4.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PLW vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and SMBS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLW | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.70% | -3.20% | -29.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -2.83% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.00% | -1.67% | -20.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -0.77% | -8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 0.98% | +1.53% |
Volatility
PLW vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) at 1.82%. This indicates that PLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLW | SMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 1.82% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.43% | 2.75% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.53% | 4.77% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.85% | 4.92% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 4.92% | +4.19% |