PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLW vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLW vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLW vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PLW
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF
-0.06%5.84%-2.95%3.31%-19.98%-1.45%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.22%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-17.48%5.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLW achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 3.22% return.


PLW

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.13%
1Y
1.84%
3Y*
0.38%
5Y*
-2.40%
10Y*
0.10%

BNDD

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
-4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLW vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLW vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLW
PLW Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLW Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLW vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLWBNDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.25

-0.41

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.39

-0.48

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.94

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

-0.37

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.97

-0.56

+1.53

PLW vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLW and BNDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLWBNDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

-0.41

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.35

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between PLW and BNDD is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PLW vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

PLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than BNDD's 3.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLW
Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF
3.81%3.75%3.56%2.87%1.97%1.15%1.00%1.96%2.14%2.02%2.00%2.14%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.64%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PLW vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLW drawdown since its inception was -32.70%, which is greater than BNDD's maximum drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLW and BNDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLWBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.70%

-30.87%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-10.93%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-27.28%

+5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-19.03%

+9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

7.26%

-4.75%

Volatility

PLW vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco 1-30 Laddered Treasury ETF (PLW) is 2.69%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that PLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLWBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.52%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

8.09%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.53%

12.44%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

13.55%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.11%

13.55%

-4.44%