PLUL vs. TNA
PLUL (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - PLUL tracks the Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLUL charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.
Performance
PLUL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLUL
- 1D
- -19.28%
- 1M
- 27.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 46.53%
- 6M
- 40.42%
- 1Y
- 118.36%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- -6.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
PLUL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | 76.52% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 23.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLUL and TNA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLUL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
PLUL
TNA
PLUL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLUL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.23 | +1.55 |
Drawdowns
PLUL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLUL drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUL and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLUL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -88.09% | +32.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.67% | -38.03% | +16.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.90% | -33.90% | +10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.86% | — |
Volatility
PLUL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLUL | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.06% | 57.08% | +133.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.06% | 67.31% | +123.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.06% | 68.42% | +122.64% |
PLUL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLUL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLUL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLUL Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLUL and TNA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.
TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.
PLUL tracks Plug Power Inc. (PLUG), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLUL and 1.14% for TNA.
Find the right allocation for PLUL and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer