PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLUL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLUL

1D
-19.28%
1M
27.31%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TNA

1D
-4.11%
1M
9.08%
YTD
46.53%
6M
40.42%
1Y
118.36%
3Y*
28.02%
5Y*
-6.21%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLUL and TNA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUL

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLUL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLULTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

0.23

+1.55

Drawdowns

PLUL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUL drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUL and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLULTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-88.09%

+32.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.67%

-38.03%

+16.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-33.90%

+10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.86%

Volatility

PLUL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLULTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

191.06%

57.08%

+133.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

191.06%

67.31%

+123.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.06%

68.42%

+122.64%

PLUL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLUL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLUL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUL
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.41%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUL and TNA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.

PLUL tracks Plug Power Inc. (PLUG), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLUL and 1.14% for TNA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer