PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUL vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLUL vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLUL

1D
-2.81%
1M
-42.30%
6M
-39.57%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ASMG

1D
-2.63%
1M
-17.29%
6M
9.24%
YTD
86.81%
1Y
307.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
105.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.03M$5.30M$5.99M
$198.99K$358.88K$1.33M

PLUL vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLUL and ASMG is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUL vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLUL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLUL vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLULASMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.78

PLUL vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLUL vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUL drawdown since its inception was -81.17%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUL and ASMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLULASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.17%

-43.95%

-37.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.15%

-35.29%

-42.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.63%

-13.54%

-22.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.24%

Volatility

PLUL vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLULASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

175.68%

92.16%

+83.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

175.68%

89.81%

+85.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

175.68%

89.81%

+85.87%

PLUL vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLUL and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

PLUL vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

PLUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLUL and ASMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLUL and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 0.00% for PLUL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUL and ASMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer