PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTZX vs. FHFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class K6 (FHFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTZX achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than FHFDX's 12.84% return.


PLTZX

1D
0.64%
1M
3.95%
YTD
9.19%
6M
10.04%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
11.58%

FHFDX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.07%
YTD
12.84%
6M
14.88%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.19%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-13.85%
FHFDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class K6
12.84%22.90%16.61%20.71%-18.89%16.43%18.08%26.76%-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTZX and FHFDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between PLTZX and FHFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTZX vs. FHFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FHFDX
FHFDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class K6 (FHFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTZXFHFDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

2.51

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

3.46

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.47

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.32

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.02

14.69

-2.67

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FHFDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTZX and FHFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTZXFHFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.51

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.73

-0.02

Drawdowns

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTZX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than FHFDX's maximum drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZX and FHFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTZXFHFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-31.28%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-9.40%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-15.56%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.79%

-27.68%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-5.84%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.12%

-0.19%

Volatility

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) is 3.30%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class K6 (FHFDX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that PLTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTZXFHFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.08%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

10.12%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

12.44%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

15.08%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

16.88%

-0.89%

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTZX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FHFDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTZX vs. FHFDX - Dividend Comparison

PLTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than FHFDX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHFDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class K6
3.62%2.73%4.97%2.00%6.36%8.51%5.00%3.40%3.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.63%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PLTZX and FHFDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHFDX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZX dropped -34.01% vs FHFDX's -31.28%.

FHFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTZX and FHFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer