PLTZX vs. ARFVX
PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) and ARFVX (American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PLTZX returned 11.66%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for ARFVX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PLTZX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for ARFVX.
Performance
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTZX achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than ARFVX's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTZX has outperformed ARFVX with an annualized return of 11.66%, while ARFVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.
PLTZX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.47%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
ARFVX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 8.98% | 17.76% | 16.89% | 20.36% | -18.81% | 18.12% | 16.60% | 27.54% | -9.24% | 22.68% |
ARFVX American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio | 7.22% | 14.75% | 11.30% | 15.16% | -17.44% | 13.36% | 17.43% | 24.02% | -5.24% | 16.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTZX and ARFVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2013 | 0.97 |
The correlation between PLTZX and ARFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTZX vs. ARFVX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTZX
ARFVX
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTZX | ARFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 2.32 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 9.90 | +1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTZX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum ARFVX drawdown of -47.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZX and ARFVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTZX | ARFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -47.41% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -7.82% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -12.64% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.79% | -25.12% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | -29.55% | -4.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.38% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -6.53% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.83% | +0.15% |
Volatility
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio (ARFVX) at 3.64%. This indicates that PLTZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTZX | ARFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 3.64% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 7.98% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 9.70% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 12.56% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 13.63% | +2.41% |
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTZX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ARFVX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTZX vs. ARFVX - Dividend Comparison
PLTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, less than ARFVX's 13.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARFVX American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio | 13.44% | 14.41% | 4.91% | 1.96% | 6.71% | 7.57% | 6.52% | 8.66% | 10.95% | 1.22% | 3.88% | 6.89% |
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 7.65% | 8.33% | 7.85% | 4.12% | 8.44% | 5.29% | 3.60% | 5.86% | 5.75% | 2.73% | 3.48% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PLTZX and ARFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PLTZX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to ARFVX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZX dropped -34.01% vs ARFVX's -47.41%.
ARFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTZX and ARFVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer