PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTY vs. LFGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTY achieves a -20.95% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.83% return.


PLTY

1D
-2.25%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-20.95%
6M
-23.85%
1Y
-6.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFGY

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
14.83%
6M
6.65%
1Y
7.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLTY and LFGY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.51

The correlation between PLTY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTYLFGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.06

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

0.16

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

0.34

-0.60

PLTY vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTY and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTY drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, roughly equal to the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTY and LFGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTYLFGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.61%

-35.94%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-35.94%

+1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.44%

-12.29%

-19.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-14.02%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.36%

16.57%

+1.79%

Volatility

PLTY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) have volatilities of 14.45% and 14.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTYLFGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.45%

14.01%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.45%

31.82%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.71%

38.34%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.62%

42.48%

+10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.62%

42.48%

+10.14%

PLTY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTY and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

PLTY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

PLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 124.27%, more than LFGY's 82.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLTY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTY has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to LFGY (14.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTY dropped -36.61% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 7.54% vs -6.06% for PLTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 14.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 7.54% return vs -6.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTY and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 124.27%, compared with 82.27% for LFGY.

LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTY and LFGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer