PLTW vs. YMAG

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -22.07% vs 16.04% for YMAG. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.

Performance

PLTW vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -31.53% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 1.19% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 5.40%
• 6M: -28.11%
• YTD: -31.53%
• 1Y: -22.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -8.79%

YMAG

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 2.76%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-31.53%	28.26%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	1.19%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and YMAG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.53

The correlation between PLTW and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

PLTW vs. YMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTW	YMAG
Technology	19.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.9%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 31
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	YMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	0.92	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	1.34	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.16	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	1.12	-1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	3.39	-4.12

PLTW vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and YMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	YMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-25.96%	-31.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.27%	-14.38%	-42.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.00%	-5.15%	-38.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.60%	-4.62%	-19.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.10%	4.74%	+25.36%

Volatility

PLTW vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 18.74% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 6.23%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	YMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.74%	6.23%	+12.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.11%	13.64%	+34.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.79%	17.47%	+44.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.64%	20.98%	+52.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.64%	20.98%	+52.66%

PLTW vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 128.07%, more than YMAG's 51.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	128.07%	72.40%	0.00%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	51.07%	52.27%	35.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and YMAG in my portfolio?

PLTW and YMAG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTW or YMAG?

PLTW has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to YMAG (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or YMAG?

On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 16.04% vs -22.07% for PLTW. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or YMAG?

Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 16.04% return vs -22.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or YMAG?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or YMAG?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 128.07%, compared with 51.07% for YMAG.

What is the main difference between PLTW and YMAG?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 1.28% for YMAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.