PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. TSYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -35.27% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -16.74% return.


PLTW

1D
-3.30%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-35.27%
6M
-38.21%
1Y
-14.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSYY

1D
0.89%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-16.74%
6M
-20.28%
1Y
-7.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-35.27%28.26%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-16.74%-22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and TSYY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTWTSYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

-0.28

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

-0.52

-0.04

PLTW vs. TSYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is comparable to the TSYY Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and TSYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -51.72%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and TSYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWTSYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.72%

-41.52%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.05%

-28.39%

-18.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.05%

-36.80%

-10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-26.06%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.24%

15.10%

+11.14%

Volatility

PLTW vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 20.76% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 6.11%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWTSYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.76%

6.11%

+14.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.24%

19.83%

+26.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.77%

31.44%

+29.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.31%

37.38%

+36.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.31%

37.38%

+36.93%

PLTW vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTW and TSYY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

PLTW vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 139.00%, less than TSYY's 280.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
139.00%72.40%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
280.23%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and TSYY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to TSYY (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -51.72% vs TSYY's -41.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -7.79% vs -14.50% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -7.79% return vs -14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTW and TSYY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 280.23%, compared with 139.00% for PLTW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares.

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and TSYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer