PLTW vs. IPDP
PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
PLTW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLTW
- 1D
- -7.81%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -26.21%
- 6M
- -26.03%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 2.66% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
PLTW vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLTW
IPDP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PLTW
IPDP
Basic Materials
PLTW
-
IPDP
Communication Services
PLTW
-
IPDP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PLTW
-
IPDP
Consumer Defensive
PLTW
-
IPDP
Energy
PLTW
-
IPDP
-
Financial Services
PLTW
-
IPDP
Healthcare
PLTW
-
IPDP
Industrials
PLTW
-
IPDP
Real Estate
PLTW
-
IPDP
-
Utilities
PLTW
-
IPDP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
IPDP
PLTW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and IPDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | 0.00% | -46.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.64% | 0.00% | -39.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | 0.00% | -19.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.21% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTW vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.73% | 0.00% | +61.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.85% | 0.00% | +72.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.85% | 0.00% | +72.85% |
PLTW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.30%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 121.30% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.30%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for PLTW and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer