PLTW vs. CHAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT).

PLTW and CHAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. CHAT is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 17, 2023.

Performance

PLTW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLTW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-22.36%	59.45%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	4.90%	39.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -22.36% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 7.69%
• 1M: 6.93%
• YTD: -22.36%
• 6M: -26.84%
• 1Y: 75.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 82.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

PLTW

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF

CHAT

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 61
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.42	-1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.04	-1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.42	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	4.94	-3.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	13.74	-10.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	2.42	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.27	-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and CHAT is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PLTW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 114.73%, more than CHAT's 2.72% yield.

	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	114.73%	72.40%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.72%	2.85%

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -45.33%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.33%	-31.34%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.33%	-16.28%	-29.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.49%	-6.73%	-29.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.36%	-5.61%	-10.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	5.85%	+13.21%

Volatility

PLTW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 18.41% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 13.21%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.41%	13.21%	+5.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.17%	23.24%	+21.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.45%	34.27%	+35.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.38%	29.27%	+44.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.38%	29.27%	+44.11%